WastedTimes
Username:   Password: 
Auto Login
  
WastedTimes
A Tribute to SameOLSam & The Limneos Forum
 
 RegisterRegister 
It is currently Fri 15 Nov, 2024
All times are UTC - 5 Hours
Piracy figures are inflated say criminologists


Users browsing this topic: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None


View previous topic Printable versionDownload TopicPrivate MessagesRefresh page View next topic
Author Message
aiolos
VIP Member
VIP Member


Joined: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 641
Piracy figures are inflated say criminologists
Reply to topic Reply with quote Go to the bottom
PostPosted: Tue 07 Nov, 2006

As if we didn' know, but here goes :


A DRAFT REPORT by the Australian Institute of Criminology says copyright holders are making up piracy figures in order to sway governments to their side.

The report says that piracy statistics are "self-serving hyperbole" which are "unverified and epistemologically unreliable".

A leaked draft of the report has ended up in the sticky paws of an Australian newspaper. It says that copyright owners "failed to explain" how they reached financial loss statistics used in lobbying activities and court cases.

Recently the Business Software Association claimed it had lost $361 million a year to Australian pirates. Author of the report Alex Malik, seems to imply that these figures are being plucked out of thin air.

Malik who is working for the AIC under a commission from the Attorney-General's Department and IP Australia, slammed the use of such statistics in court.

Malik's report also dismisses claims that copyright theft is being carried out by organised crime. He said that either there is no evidence of any links between piracy and organised crime or no one has been able to find them."

Malik added that either these statistics should be withdrawn or the purveyors of these statistics must supply valid and transparent substantiation. However it looks like the report is set to be watered down. Since the draft has been made public, the BSAA has had a hissy fit.

Now Institute principal criminologist Russell Smith said the report was "an early draft" that was "being edited" by the agency.

Smith said that the institute wouldn't use language like Malik's because it's not accurate, hyperbolic and overblown. Of course this does not stop it being true and it is nice that someone official actually tried to say it.
_________________
I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code !
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
   Board Index
   -> Open Discussion, Open Discussion
View previous topic Printable versionDownload TopicPrivate MessagesRefresh page View next topic

Page 1 of 1  [ 1 Posts ]
 


Jump to:   
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
You can download attachments in this forum

Search: