hbgator Forum Administrator
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 1221 Location: 2 blocks over
|
British download fans face legal backlash |
Posted: Tue 06 Jun, 2006 |
|
British music fans are being warned they could face legal action for downloading music from a leading website.
Thousands of British users have been using the Russian-based website AllofMP3.com to download tracks and albums at a fraction of their usual cost.
But the website, which poses as a legitimate online store, actually sells pirated recordings.
Now, the British music industry body, the BPI, said it will consider tracking down people who have breached copyright laws by downloading illegal tracks.
Around 14 per cent of all downloads in the UK are through the website.
A leading lawyer said that users of the site should wake up to the fact that they are funding criminals.
"Many users who download music from this site are likely to assume that as the site states it complies with Russian law and licence, and fees are being paid, everything is above board," said Alice Gould, a partner at law firm Wedlake bell.
"A huge number of people could be inadvertently breaking the law."
AllofMP3 claims that a loophole in Russian copyright law allows it to sell tracks considerably cheaper than its western rivals.
An entire album typically costs about £1 too buy from the site, compared with 79p for an individual track through Apple's iTunes Music Store.
It is not known exactly how many British users of the website realise that they are breaking the law, but Ms Gould believes that users should realise their mistake before they are faced with the consequences.
The US media industry has already put pressure on Russian officials to close AllofMP3, to no avail.
Reports have even suggested that American companies are taking the matter so seriously that it could quash Russia's attempt to join the World Trade Organisation |
|
|
squire VIP Member
Joined: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 113
|
(No subject) |
Posted: Tue 06 Jun, 2006 |
|
Well, the legal download sites could always drastically cut their costs and price the site out of business, but isn't it funny that such reductions are never considered as an option? What would the shareholders say? |
|
|